RideCare Installation and Pairing Research
Last updated: 20. Dec 2025
To improve the installation and pairing instructions, I worked with a service designer in RideCare's product team to conduct four observation sessions and nine installer interviews.
Observations
From the observations sessions, I was able to map out how the installation process works, the first step towards understanding how the instructions needed to be rewritten.
I learned that paper instructions failed to communicate key installation details that were difficult to convey through images alone. In many cases, installation and pairing were handled by two different people: one focused on installing the hardware, while the other handled pairing through a laptop dashboard needed to confirm proper setup.
Interviews
After the observations, we conducted interviews, to learn about installers experiences, and understand how our team could support and enhance their experience.
Pain Points
Unclear Instructions: Written instructions failed to highlight key installation steps, leading to incorrect setups and inaccurate sensor data.
Pairing Inefficiency: The pairing process needed major improvements. Mass pairings weren’t possible, VINs had to be entered manually, and installers couldn’t see which sensors were already installed.
Dashboard Access: The dashboard could only be accessed from a computer, which meant installers had to bring their laptops for basic tasks like checking sensor status or completing the pairing process.
Redesigned Process
The improved flow helps installers quickly check sensor and vehicle status, confirm compatibility, and move through installation, pairing, and baseline steps more efficiently.
Information Architecture
Following, I created an IA artifact to map out all the screens/features we needed, and to ensure we weren't missing anything in the process.
User Flow
After compiling all the information that was needed for each feature/phase, I put together a small user-flow that reflected the screens and ideas from the sketched flow
